aapy: higher weight for larger pools
This commit is contained in:
parent
1f3ffa42a2
commit
2449665fad
2 changed files with 15 additions and 5 deletions
|
|
@ -16,22 +16,28 @@ impl APYAggregator {
|
|||
I: Iterator<Item = PoolPeriod>,
|
||||
{
|
||||
let mut weighted_apy_sum = Decimal::ZERO;
|
||||
let mut total_active_time = Decimal::ZERO;
|
||||
let mut total_weight = Decimal::ZERO;
|
||||
|
||||
for pool in pools {
|
||||
let days_active = pool.duration_days(&period_start)?;
|
||||
|
||||
if !days_active.is_zero() {
|
||||
let (_pool_yield, apy) = pool.yield_and_apy(&period_start)?;
|
||||
weighted_apy_sum += apy * days_active;
|
||||
total_active_time += days_active;
|
||||
|
||||
// we give larger pools more weight in the aggregated apy. They have more liquidity,
|
||||
// so the aggregated number will be more accurate.
|
||||
let pool_size = pool.end_k_sqrt()?;
|
||||
let weighted_apy = apy * days_active * pool_size;
|
||||
|
||||
weighted_apy_sum += weighted_apy;
|
||||
total_weight += days_active * pool_size;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if total_active_time.is_zero() {
|
||||
if total_weight.is_zero() {
|
||||
Ok(Decimal::ZERO)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Ok(weighted_apy_sum / total_active_time)
|
||||
Ok(weighted_apy_sum / total_weight)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -77,6 +77,10 @@ impl PoolPeriod {
|
|||
.unwrap_or_default())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn end_k_sqrt(&self) -> Result<Decimal> {
|
||||
self.end_k.sqrt().context("failed to sqrt end")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn pool_yield(&self) -> Result<Decimal> {
|
||||
let start_k_sr = self.start_k.sqrt().context("failed to sqrt start")?;
|
||||
let end_k_sr = self.end_k.sqrt().context("failed to sqrt end")?;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue