The sign_message extension leaves replay to the dapp, because a signature proves key control over an exact string and carries no freshness or audience. The previous commit said so in three places in the docs. That is exactly the failure this repository should not ship: a login built on a bare signMessage call works in every manual test and is a password that never expires, so documenting the requirement mostly relocates the blame. So the two failures that matter are structural here rather than advisory: verifyLoginChallenge cannot be called without `domain` and `consumeNonce`. There is no overload that omits them. Verifying a login without single-use enforcement and audience binding is not something this API can express — if you want plain signature verification, verifyMessageSignatureForAddress is right there and is honestly named. createLoginChallenge refuses a nonce under MIN_NONCE_LENGTH and refuses a line break in any field, so neither a guessable nonce nor an injected `Nonce:` line can reach a signed message. Check order is deliberate: parse, domain, expiry, signature, THEN consume the nonce. Consuming earlier would let anyone who sniffs a nonce burn it with a garbage signature before the real user finishes signing; there is a test asserting the nonce survives a bad signature and the genuine login still completes. consumeNonce is a caller-supplied callback rather than a store this module owns, because single-use enforcement is a property of the caller's database — two replays arriving together both reach that point and only one may be told true. The docstring says it must be atomic. createInMemoryNonceStore exists for development and says plainly that it is per-process, so two servers behind a load balancer would each honour the same signature once. parseLoginChallenge is strict: unknown fields, duplicate fields, out-of-order fields and stray lines are rejected rather than skipped, so exactly one byte sequence parses to a given challenge. A lenient parser is where field injection lives. Address is optional in the message because under wallet_choice the dapp does not yet know which key will answer. When present the proof is self-describing — a third party reading the message alone sees which address was claimed — and verification then requires the recovered address to match it. NOT SIWE. The layout is deliberately similar to Sign-In With Ethereum so it reads familiarly, but it does not claim EIP-4361 or CAIP-122 compatibility: there is no agreed SIWX profile for Bitcoin Cash to conform to. If one lands it belongs beside this as a second format, not as a silent change to this one. Also adds addressesEqual() to message-signing, which compares decoded public key hashes so prefixed CashAddr, bare CashAddr, the token-aware form and legacy base58 all compare equal for the same key. 27 tests, mostly about what must be refused: the replay, the wrong site, the stale and future-dated challenge, four field-injection attempts, the nonce-burning attack, the wrong key, and a cross-encoding address match. test-cli now builds its challenge with these helpers rather than hand-rolled text, since that is what integrators copy, and verifies the response twice — once as a third party would and once as the server would, printing proof that replaying the identical signature is rejected. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
24 KiB
Protocol
The application-level protocol has two layers:
- Base protocol — the handshake messages (
dapp_ready,wallet_ready,disconnect) that are shared across all application protocols and live in@wizardconnect/core/protocols/base.ts. - hdwalletv1 — the BCH HD-wallet protocol, carrying session data (xpubs) and
sign request round-trips. Defined in
@wizardconnect/core/protocols/hdwalletv1.ts.
Both layers use the same encrypted relay channel (see transport.md).
Protocol selection happens during the handshake via supported_protocols lists, not via a
hard-coded field. This allows forward-compatible negotiation when future protocol versions are added.
Message envelope
Every message shares a base shape:
interface ProtocolMessage {
action: string; // one of the RelayMsgAction values below
time: number; // Unix timestamp (seconds). Used for replay filtering.
}
The time field is checked by the relay client: messages older than the last-processed timestamp
are silently dropped. This prevents stale messages buffered at the relay from being re-delivered
after a reconnect.
Actions
dapp_ready — dapp → wallet, signals dapp is alive + lists supported protocols
wallet_ready — wallet → dapp, signals wallet is alive + delivers session data + key exchange
sign_transaction_request — dapp → wallet, asks wallet to sign a transaction
sign_transaction_response — wallet → dapp, returns signed tx or error
sign_cancel — dapp → wallet only, cancels an in-flight sign_transaction_request
or sign_message_request
sign_message_request — dapp → wallet, asks wallet to sign a plain message, proving key
control without a transaction. Gated on the `sign_message`
extension. See extensions.md.
sign_message_response — wallet → dapp, returns the signature, the signing key and its address
disconnect — either → either, courtesy notification before tearing down
chunk — either → either, transport-level. Carries one slice of a larger message
that exceeds NIP-44's 65,535-byte plaintext ceiling. Not tied to
hdwalletv1 semantics. See transport.md.
The action names above are the well-known set. Extensions may define additional action strings
(e.g. decrypt_request, decrypt_response). Both sides should ignore unknown actions gracefully.
See extensions.md for conventions on defining extension messages.
Base protocol
dapp_ready
interface DappReadyMessage {
action: "dapp_ready";
supported_protocols: string[]; // protocols this dapp supports, in preference order
selected_protocol?: string; // set only on the reactive dapp_ready (after seeing wallet_ready)
wallet_discovered: boolean; // true if dapp already saw this wallet this session
dapp_name?: string; // optional, sent on first message for wallet UI
dapp_icon?: string; // optional icon URL or data-URI
time: number;
}
dapp_name and dapp_icon are captured by the wallet on the first dapp_ready that includes
them. The wallet shows these in its connections list.
selected_protocol is absent on the proactive dapp_ready (sent before the dapp has seen
the wallet). Once the dapp receives wallet_ready and picks a protocol, the reactive dapp_ready
carries selected_protocol so the wallet can confirm the agreed protocol.
wallet_ready
interface WalletReadyMessage {
action: "wallet_ready";
supported_protocols: string[]; // protocols this wallet supports
wallet_name: string;
wallet_icon: string;
dapp_discovered: boolean; // true if wallet already saw this dapp this session
session: Record<string, unknown>; // keyed by protocol name; each value is protocol-specific
public_key: string; // wallet's Nostr x-only pubkey (hex, 32 bytes) — key exchange
secret: string; // echo of the shared secret from the URI — MITM prevention
time: number;
}
wallet_ready is the most important message in the protocol. It serves two purposes:
-
Key exchange —
public_keyis the wallet's Nostr pubkey;secretis echoed from the connection URI for MITM prevention. The dapp verifies the secret and callssetPairedPublicKey(public_key)before processing the rest of the message. This is whywallet_readybypasses the relay-client peer filter. -
Application handshake — the wallet populates
sessionfor every protocol it supports. The dapp picks the first protocol from its ownsupported_protocolslist that also appears in the wallet's list, then readssession[selectedProtocol]for the protocol-specific data.
Protocol negotiation
- The dapp sends its
supported_protocolslist in the proactivedapp_ready. - The wallet replies with its own
supported_protocolsand thesessionmap. - The dapp selects
agreed = dapp.supported_protocols.find(p => wallet.supported_protocols.includes(p)). - If no overlap: the dapp sends
disconnect(reason: "protocol_mismatch")and emits adisconnectevent. No further communication happens. - If agreed: the dapp reads
session[agreed]and sends a reactivedapp_readywithselected_protocol = agreed.
Handshake
The handshake uses a mutual-discovery pattern. The goal is for both sides to converge to a live session regardless of who reconnects first. "Discovered" means "I have received and processed a ready message from the other side in this runtime session."
Rules
- On every connect/reconnect, each side sends its own "ready" message proactively. The wallet
sends
wallet_readyimmediately (it already knows the dapp's pubkey from the URI). The dapp sendsdapp_readyonce the relay is connected and key exchange resolves. - Each "ready" message carries a boolean indicating whether the sender has already seen the
other party (
wallet_discoveredindapp_ready,dapp_discoveredinwallet_ready). - On receiving a "ready" with the discovery flag
false, the receiver must send back its own "ready" — even if it already sent one — because the other side has lost state and needs a fresh delivery. - The wallet guards against duplicate
wallet_readymessages within a single connection cycle viawalletReadySentThisCycle. BothwalletReadySentThisCycleanddappDiscoveredreset tofalseon each new connect/reconnect. This ensures the wallet always sendswallet_ready(dapp_discovered=false)at the start of a new connection cycle, matching the "Wallet reconnects" scenario. Receivingdapp_ready(wallet_discovered=false)also resetswalletReadySentThisCycle.
Scenarios
Initial connect (neither has seen the other):
Dapp ──dapp_ready(supported=["hdwalletv1"], wallet_discovered=false)──▶ Wallet (proactive)
Dapp ◀──wallet_ready(supported=["hdwalletv1"], session={...}, dapp_discovered=false)── Wallet
Dapp ──dapp_ready(supported=["hdwalletv1"], selected="hdwalletv1", wallet_discovered=true)──▶ Wallet
After step 3 the wallet sets dappDiscovered = true. No more ready messages unless a reconnect.
Wallet reconnects (dapp still running, walletDiscovered=true):
Dapp ──dapp_ready(wallet_discovered=true)──────────────────────────────▶ Wallet (proactive)
Dapp ◀──wallet_ready(dapp_discovered=false, session={...})────────────── Wallet (proactive)
Dapp ──dapp_ready(selected="hdwalletv1", wallet_discovered=true)────────▶ Wallet (reactive)
Dapp reconnects (browser refresh, wallet still running):
Dapp ──dapp_ready(wallet_discovered=false)──────────────────────────────▶ Wallet (proactive)
Dapp ◀──wallet_ready(dapp_discovered=true, session={...})─────────────── Wallet (reactive)
(No third message: dapp_discovered=true means the dapp does not need to send a reactive reply.)
Design decision: why mutual discovery?
An alternative is a fixed initiator/responder role (only the dapp initiates). That breaks when the wallet reconnects while the dapp is still alive — the wallet would wait for a dapp message that never comes because the dapp thinks the session is live. Mutual discovery means each side sends a "hello" on reconnect without depending on the other side's state.
hdwalletv1 protocol
The hdwalletv1 session data is carried in wallet_ready.session["hdwalletv1"]. It delivers
everything the dapp needs to derive an unlimited number of addresses without further contact with
the wallet.
Hdwalletv1Session
interface Hdwalletv1Session {
paths: PathXpub[]; // BIP32 xpubs for each named path
extensions?: Record<string, unknown>; // optional extension capabilities and data
}
Carried as wallet_ready.session["hdwalletv1"]. The dapp validates it with isHdwalletv1Session().
The extensions field is optional. When present, each key is an extension name and its presence
indicates the wallet supports that extension. The value carries extension-specific handshake data,
or {} if no data is needed. See extensions.md for the full extension system.
See pubkey-derivation.md for the full xpub story.
PathXpub
interface PathXpub {
name: PathName; // "receive" | "change" | "defi"
xpub: string; // BIP32 base58-encoded extended public key
}
name is the protocol-level identifier. The dapp uses the name to know what kind of addresses to
derive from the xpub; it does not need to know (or care) where the wallet derived the xpub from.
Highly recommended derivation paths. To ensure addresses are recognised by other wallets and blockchain explorers, wallets should derive xpubs from the standard BIP44 paths for BCH:
| Name | Recommended derivation path | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
receive |
m/44'/145'/0'/0 |
External receive addresses |
change |
m/44'/145'/0'/1 |
Internal change addresses |
defi |
m/44'/145'/0'/7 |
DeFi / Cauldron addresses |
Using these paths means the same addresses will appear in any BIP44-compatible wallet that holds the same seed, making fund recovery straightforward.
Privacy-first alternative: any path per session. The protocol does not enforce the recommended paths. A wallet that prioritises privacy may derive xpubs from non-standard or randomly-chosen paths, and may even rotate them each session. The dapp derives addresses correctly regardless — it never sees the path, only the xpub. The trade-off is that funds sent to session-specific paths will not be found by standard wallet recovery tools without additional metadata.
Design decision: names instead of child indices. The protocol uses human-readable names rather
than numeric child indices because the derivation path is a wallet-internal detail. A name like
"receive" is stable and meaningful; the corresponding BIP44 index is an implementation concern
that only the wallet (and internal dapp state) need to know.
PathName
type PathName = string;
// Well-known path names:
const PATH_RECEIVE = "receive";
const PATH_CHANGE = "change";
const PATH_DEFI = "defi";
PathName is an open string. The well-known values are:
| Name | Recommended BIP44 path | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
receive |
m/44'/145'/0'/0 |
External receive addresses |
change |
m/44'/145'/0'/1 |
Internal change addresses |
defi |
m/44'/145'/0'/7 |
DeFi / Cauldron addresses |
Wallets may include additional paths via extensions (e.g. stealth_scan, stealth_spend, rpa).
Dapps should ignore path names they do not recognize. See extensions.md for
conventions on defining new path names.
sign_transaction_request
interface SignTransactionRequest {
action: "sign_transaction_request";
transaction: WcSignTransactionRequest; // from @bch-wc2/interfaces
sequence: number;
inputPaths: [number, PathName, number][]; // [inputIndex, pathName, addressIndex]
time: number;
}
sequence is a unique number generated by RelayClient.nextSequence(). It starts at a random
offset (to avoid collisions across sessions) and increments by 2 per call. The dapp uses sequence
to match responses to requests.
WcSignTransactionRequest describes a Bitcoin Cash transaction: inputs, outputs, source outputs
(for signing), version, locktime, and an optional userPrompt string shown to the user in the
wallet UI.
inputPaths is a sparse array of [inputIndex, PathName, addressIndex] tuples. Each entry identifies
the HD derivation path name and address index the dapp used to derive the locking script for the input
at position inputIndex. Only inputs that require wallet signing need an entry — contract inputs with
pre-set unlocking bytecode can be omitted. This allows the wallet to sign each input without scanning
or guessing which key was used.
SIGHASH requirement (security-critical)
Wallets MUST sign every input with SIGHASH_ALL | SIGHASH_FORKID | SIGHASH_UTXOS and MUST
reject any request that would require different flags.
SIGHASH_ALL ensures the signature commits to the entire transaction (all inputs and all outputs).
Without it, an attacker could collect a valid signature and graft it onto a different transaction —
for example, using SIGHASH_NONE an attacker could replace every output to redirect funds.
Because inputPaths lets the dapp specify which key signs each input, the wallet no longer
independently verifies that the key matches the UTXO's locking bytecode. This is safe only when
SIGHASH_ALL is enforced: if the dapp provides a wrong path, the resulting signature is invalid
(public key hash mismatch) and the transaction cannot broadcast. Without SIGHASH_ALL, a
wrong-key signature could still be repurposed in a different transaction context.
Summary of the flags:
| Flag | Purpose |
|---|---|
SIGHASH_ALL |
Commits to all inputs and outputs — prevents output substitution |
SIGHASH_FORKID |
Prevents cross-fork replay (BCH ↔ BTC) |
SIGHASH_UTXOS |
Commits to all input UTXOs — prevents input substitution after signing |
sign_transaction_response
interface SignTransactionResponse {
action: "sign_transaction_response";
sequence: number;
signedTransaction: string; // hex-encoded fully signed transaction
error?: string; // if present, signing failed; signedTransaction is ""
time: number;
}
The wallet either returns the signed transaction hex or an error string. The dapp rejects the
pending Promise associated with the sequence in the error case.
Re-delivery on reconnect
If the wallet is not connected (or reconnects) while a sign_transaction_request is in flight,
the dapp automatically re-sends all pending requests when it receives wallet_ready. This
handles the common case where the user triggers a transaction in the dapp and then opens the
wallet app several seconds later.
The wallet deduplicates incoming requests by sequence number — if it has already emitted
pendingSignRequest for a given sequence and has not yet responded, the duplicate is silently
dropped. The dedup guard is cleared when the wallet sends a response (sign_transaction_response)
or receives a sign_cancel.
sign_cancel
interface SignCancelMessage {
action: "sign_cancel";
sequence: number; // must match the sequence of the sign_transaction_request being cancelled
reason?: string; // optional human-readable explanation
time: number;
}
Sent by the dapp only to cancel an in-flight sign_transaction_request or
sign_message_request. The wallet should dismiss the corresponding dialog immediately upon
receipt.
One sign_cancel unambiguously names one request of either kind, because both draw their
sequence from a single per-connection counter (RelayClient.nextSequence). That shared sequence
space is also why the wallet's dedup guard is shared: a sequence identifies a request regardless of
its action.
Use cases:
- User presses cancel on the dapp side while waiting for the wallet to sign.
- Dapp replaces a stale request with a new one (e.g., trade price has changed).
- A login prompt the user never answered.
sign_messagehas no timeout by design — cancellation is explicit, matchingsign_transaction_request.
Dapp side (DappConnectionManager):
sendSignCancel(sequence, reason?)— immediately rejects the pending Promise for that sequence, then sendssign_cancelto the wallet.
Wallet side (WalletConnectionManager):
- Incoming
sign_cancelemits asignCancelledevent (connectionId,sequence,reason). The host app is responsible for dismissing the sign dialog.
sign_message
Proves control of a key without a transaction: identity verification, SIWX-style login, or a signed
statement that can be published on chain. Gated on the sign_message extension — see
extensions.md.
The signature is the standard "Bitcoin Signed Message" construction, so it verifies in Electron
Cash, Electrum and bitcoin-cli verifymessage. That portability is the point: a third party holding
only the message, the signature and an address can check it, with no knowledge of this protocol.
sign_message_request
interface SignMessageRequest {
action: "sign_message_request";
sequence: number;
message: string; // exact UTF-8 to sign — never trimmed or normalised
userPrompt?: string; // dapp-supplied context for the wallet's prompt; NOT signed
path?: PathName; // omit both to let the wallet choose the key
addressIndex?: number;
scheme?: "bitcoin_signed_message"; // default when absent
time: number;
}
SignMessageRequest extends WcSignMessageRequest from @bch-wc2/interfaces — the interface
wallets already implement for WalletConnect — so the object can be passed straight to an existing
WC2 signMessage handler. hdwalletv1 adds only the optional key selection, mirroring how
SignTransactionRequest wraps WcSignTransactionRequest and adds inputPaths.
Key selection is all-or-nothing. path and addressIndex must both be present or both absent;
half of one is ambiguous between the two modes and is rejected.
| Mode | Request | Who picks the key | Needs an xpub? |
|---|---|---|---|
dapp_path |
path + addressIndex set |
dapp | yes |
wallet_choice |
both omitted | wallet | no |
wallet_choice exists for pure identity checks, where requiring an xpub would mean sharing the
user's whole address history to prove control of one key. A wallet advertising it must choose
deterministically: a dapp treats the returned address as a durable identity, so a fresh key per
connection makes a returning user unrecognisable.
sign_message_response
// Success
interface SignMessageSuccess {
action: "sign_message_response";
sequence: number;
signature: string; // base64, 65 bytes decoded — a WcSignMessageResponse
publicKey: string; // hex, in the serialisation the signature's header declares
address: string; // CashAddr of publicKey
scheme: "bitcoin_signed_message";
path?: PathName; // echoed: what the wallet actually used
addressIndex?: number;
time: number;
}
// Failure
interface SignMessageFailure {
action: "sign_message_response";
sequence: number;
error: string;
time: number;
}
publicKey and address are required on success. Under wallet_choice they are the dapp's only
way to learn which key answered, and requiring them means a dapp can always verify rather than
sometimes.
The compression bit is load-bearing. The signature's header byte declares whether the public key
is compressed, and a key's compressed and uncompressed forms hash to two different addresses. A
response must report the form its header declares, or it is claiming a proof about an address it did
not prove. recoverMessageSigner() returns { publicKey, compressed } together for this reason.
What the wallet checks
WalletConnectionManager.sendSignMessageResponse() derives publicKey and address from the
signature by recovery rather than accepting them from the adapter, so the three can never disagree.
It then compares the recovered key against the adapter's own key for the path, and throws on
mismatch. Recovery alone cannot detect a signature over the wrong text — it succeeds and yields some
other key — so this comparison is what turns a wallet-side bug into an error at the call site
instead of an opaque rejection across the relay.
What the dapp checks
DappConnectionManager.signMessage() resolves only after verifying that the signature recovers over
the message it sent, that publicKey is the key that signed, that address is that key's address,
and — when the dapp named a path it can derive — that the signer is exactly the key it asked for.
Anything inconsistent rejects. See dapp.md.
Replay is the verifier's responsibility
A signature proves key control over that exact text. It carries no freshness and no audience: it
is valid forever and to everyone. A login flow must put a single-use, server-issued nonce in
message and retire it after one use; nothing at the protocol level can enforce that.
Use createLoginChallenge() / verifyLoginChallenge() from @wizardconnect/core rather than
composing the text yourself — verifyLoginChallenge cannot be called without a nonce-consuming
callback and an expected domain, which is the enforcement this layer cannot provide. See
dapp.md § Replay.
Re-delivery on reconnect
Handled exactly like sign_transaction_request: the dapp re-sends pending requests on
wallet_ready, and the wallet's shared dedup guard means a replay does not re-prompt the user.
disconnect
Either side may send a disconnect message before tearing down the relay connection. This is a
courtesy notification — the remote side treats the connection as closed immediately upon receipt
(no acknowledgement).
enum DisconnectReason {
ProtocolMismatch = "protocol_mismatch", // no common protocol found during handshake
UserDisconnect = "user_disconnect", // explicit user or application action
}
interface DisconnectMessage {
action: "disconnect";
reason: DisconnectReason;
message?: string; // optional human-readable detail
time: number;
}
Wallet side (WalletConnectionManager):
disconnect(id)sendsUserDisconnectbefore cleaning up.- Incoming
disconnectemits aremoteDisconnectevent (connectionId,reason,message) and removes the connection.
Dapp side (DappConnectionManager):
sendDisconnect(message?)sendsUserDisconnect. Caller then callsdappRelay.cleanup().- Protocol mismatch during
handleWalletReadysendsProtocolMismatchand emits adisconnectevent (reason,message). - Incoming
disconnectemits adisconnectevent.
Type guards
@wizardconnect/core exports runtime type guards for all protocol messages:
isProtocolMessage(obj) → ProtocolMessage
isDappReadyMessage(obj) → DappReadyMessage
isWalletReadyMessage(obj) → WalletReadyMessage
isDisconnectMessage(obj) → DisconnectMessage
isHdwalletv1Session(obj) → Hdwalletv1Session
isPathXpub(obj) → PathXpub
isErrorMessage(obj) → ErrorMessage
isSignTransactionRequest(obj) → SignTransactionRequest
isSignCancelMessage(obj) → SignCancelMessage
These are used internally to validate incoming messages before dispatch.
Helper: childIndexOfPathName
function childIndexOfPathName(name: PathName): number | undefined
// "receive" → 0, "change" → 1, "defi" → 7, unknown → undefined
The protocol uses string names for paths, but code that manages key state internally (such as
DappPubkeyStateManager) keys its maps by numeric child index. This helper converts between the
two representations for the well-known path names. It returns undefined for extension path names
(e.g. "stealth_scan"). Callers must handle the undefined case — typically by skipping the path.
It is not a protocol concern — the numeric indices never appear on the wire.